As
promised, here’s the second post regarding my take on higher education. If you’re
new you can read my first post to understand what I’m doing. New or
not, you need to know that my goal is to write for the least common denominator
here; I’m writing with the idea that there may be many of you who have no clue
what happens in the administration of higher education and other than listening
to politicians rail on colleges and universities as of late (or perhaps you’re
getting ready to send a kid to school in the near future), had
no-freaking-reason to care before now.
Also,
I am just going to use the word university or school for both colleges and
universities, and for the most part, I’m talking about four year institutions.
I’m
trying to take rather complex problems, which universities attempt to fix in
numerous ways, and make one simple narrative out of it all. I think of the
President while I write this-- a smart guy, who probably would like to see
evidence of my argument, but doesn’t have a lot of time to spend on it or the
desire for me to try to prove how smart I am. This one’s for you, Barack Obama.
I am going to explain how university money works and why your SOTU address made employees of universities curse at their
TVs.
In
other words, if you know something about working in a university already and
this explanation makes you want to punch me in the mouth because of its
over-simplicity, I ask that you please don’t actually punch me in the mouth.
Where do universities get
their money? It
depends on what kind of university they are. There are three main types:
non-profit public schools, non-profit private schools, and for-profit schools.
Where they get their money depends on what kind of school they are, so I’ve
made a table:
Type of School
|
Non-Profit Publics
|
Non-Profit Privates
|
For-Profits
|
Types of Money
|
State money
Federal money- (including grants) Tuition Investments- (endowment/gifts) Other- (hospital, stores, etc.) |
Investments-
(endowment/gifts)
Tuition Federal money- (including grants) Other- (hospital, stores, etc. |
Tuition
Federal money Other (if at all) |
Examples of Schools
|
University
of (state name here) systems
|
Harvard,
Yale, etc.
|
Cappella,
DeVry, Kaplan, Phoenix.
|
One
thing to note- these are in order of the amount each type of school typically
receives. Don’t believe me (or don’t like my table)? Check out this cool infographic that breaks it down even further.
Great,
now we know where the money comes from. But
what happens when there’s not enough money?
This
happens a lot. For the most part, it’s state money that gets cut for publics
and endowments go down for privates (from here on out I’m pretty much going to
ignore for-profits). Reductions can be huge. Check out this infographic that describes how funding has been
reduced in our system for the past twelve years, and pay attention to the
difference between what is promised and what is actually received.
Universities
have two big options when they have a deficit: they find a way to make up the
deficit or they reduce their costs. Keep in mind—they are non-profits, so they
cannot hold on to money (aka, make a profit). Use it or lose it.
Some
schools try to make up the deficit by making more money. An example would be
asking faculty to seek grant money for their research. The competition is steep
and the money so restricted to the specialization that I’m not going to say
anything further about grants here.
How do they reduce costs? State schools usually have
a mission that has been given to them by their state legislature. They have to
meet that mission, no matter what. Private schools have obligations as
well—especially to donors. And there are people to pay. They have to keep the
lights on and have to heat the buildings. The first thing that is usually
trimmed is any excess in operating costs (think office supplies—seriously—it
gets down to counting pieces of paper printed and staples and reusing file
folders). Once that is exhausted, there is a moratorium placed on events and
travel (faculty tend to travel to conferences, and that’s pretty important—but
there’ll be more on that later when we talk about what it’s actually like to be
a faculty member), and the university then moves to mission critical. In fact,
many universities have been on mission critical for about a decade or so. In
mission critical we start seeing hiring freezes, salary freezes and furloughs.
Go
look up furloughs right now, if you’re unfamiliar with the concept in higher
education.
I’ve
heard of some places where the faculty got together, and decided that instead
of furloughs or firing people, they would all take a pay reduction. When I
worked at a private university in 2008 (aka, economic apocalypse for those who
use gift/endowment money invested in the stock market) the Chancellor actually
gave back a chunk of his salary and urged senior faculty members to do the
same.
And if there are no more
costs to cut? They
increase tuition and fees and admit more students. Class sizes go up. Dorms are
overfilled. Yada, yada, yada.
What happens when they
increase tuition? With
privates, not much. People get pissed off, students may have to drop out, and
potential donors might balk, but relatively little happens to them when
compared to public schools. With publics (especially in this state), the state
legislature has to vote on the tuition increase, and if it’s ‘too big’,
universities get penalized. Also, the legislature or governor threatens to take
even more of the money away and it becomes highly political. It just keeps
escalating, and with more students the need for funds just gets worse.
Better
yet—think about this: Politicians reduce state funding. Tuition is raised
because state funding is reduced. Politicians rail against universities for
increasing tuition. Politicians then approve the tuition increase, and then
promise to reduce funding even further. Universities then have to raise tuition
again when funding is further reduced. Then they rail some more on the
increased tuition that they approved. Does this seem logical?
So why do you think what
Barack Obama said was so bad?
Let’s take politics out of it. State and federal governments are not bringing
in the money they did before. That’s a fact. No matter if you agree with it or
not, higher education gets cut when they try to balance their budgets. But to threaten to cut funding even further because tuition
was raised because funding was cut is idiotic. There, I said it. Mr.
President, I hope you read this, and think about it for a little while, and
consider changing your rhetoric. I have motion sensors in my office to reduce
the electric bill that make my lights go off if I sit too still for 15 minutes,
and we reuse everything we have until it falls apart. Staff only replace their
computers every five years. We continue to limp along. The good news is
at my university, our service is greatly appreciated and we are thanked by the
administration at every opportunity. I don’t think everyone could say that.
Next
time, we’ll talk about where all this money goes. How do universities
spend the money they do have? It’s more complicated than you think.
No comments:
Post a Comment