Where I grew up, the cycle of the year was ticked off by the
seasons. Opening day of trout season. Time to plant the garden. Time to pick
strawberries. Then blueberries. Then the blackberries which grew wild in our
backyard. Crappie fishing. Time to dig
up the garden. Time to freeze and dry and can. Bow season. Rifle season. Turkey
and deer. Ducks. Pheasants. This was the way many families put food on the
table. This was the way my family often put food on the table. This is what I would
prefer to put on my table, if only I had the time.
I grew up around guns. I took gun safety and hunter’s education classes.
I shot guns. I enjoy eating the product of a rifle or a shotgun. In fact, if I
remember correctly, while I was in high school, you could even bring your rifle
to the school parking lot (for some before- or after-school hunting) as long as
it was visibly in a gun rack in the back window.
I’m certain that’s changed by now; I went to high school before
Columbine. Nevertheless, guns were not an issue.
And then they were. And I still believed in the second amendment. I
understand that most liberals do not support the second amendment. I remained
silent about my beliefs, because I also understand the right to NOT arm one’s
self.
And you do have the right to not arm yourself. I cannot judge you
for that choice; I don’t want to judge you for that choice. When J and I had sons,
we made the conscious decision to not have guns in the house during their
childhood. Our children are precocious, and I take no chances with my children.
I understand those who want to take no chances with their children, too.
We have this in common.
You see, there are some things I agree with, when it comes to
those who would prefer to outright ban firearms. I don’t just see differences. I
see the similarities.
People get their hands on guns way too easy these days. People get
their hands on semi-automatic assault rifles WAY too easy. I want assault
rifles re-banned. I want extended clips banned. I want the gun show loophole
banned. I want hollow point ammunition banned. I want it to be impossible for
private parties to sell their guns to other private parties without the
transfer of registration—like you have to do with a car—and a background check.
I do not mind waiting for five days, a week, ten days, etc. I don’t like
conceal and carry licenses, because I think it’s way too easy to get one.
And while I’ve—for the most part—kept my mouth shut on this topic
until last week, now I HAVE to speak up. You have to know that I exist. That
others, like me, exist.
Because the
NRA does not represent me.
Because the
NRA does not represent the majority of gun owners. Most gun
owners I know don’t think people should be able to buy an assault rifle on the
internet. At a Wal-Mart. At all, even.
Because I do
not believe in a database tracking those who’ve expressed concerns over their
mental health.
Because there
are 24 legislators who are trying to pass a bill in my state that would allow
teachers and administrators to conceal and carry in MY CHILDREN’S SCHOOLS. I don’t
mind resource officers and off-duty or retired police officers being present
during school starts, lunches, and dismissals. I’m willing to talk about that;
hell, that’s been a common practice in our secondary schools for quite some
time now. But, I don’t want armed volunteers—people I do not know, people who
may not be adequately trained—around my children, with or without me being
present. I want to tell you why I think that’s a bad idea.
Because I
think the issue here is a complex one, including multiple areas of discussion—especially
adequate mental health services-- but while we need to get that under control,
we still need some limits on weapons someone can buy. The NRA
talks about a slippery slope, and I see a half-pipe. Ban assault rifles and we
might ban everything? Have you ever considered the other way around? Have you ever
considered if you would feel comfortable with your neighbor having a tank?
Grenades? A missile launcher?
I am in the Common Ground. I am waiting for everyone else to join
me for civil, rational discussion.
I am the upstanding citizen who does not believe in the repeal of
the Second Amendment, but wants to compromise with those who may. Who wants to
legitimately listen to THEIR SIDE of things. Who wants to be heard over the
voices of the vocal minorities, like the NRA.
I am the voice that says—everyone in this country deserves to feel
safer than they do now. Every child in this nation deserves to go to school in
a safe, innocent place. Individuals currently have the right to demonstrate
their responsible gun ownership, but that doesn’t have to be with military-grade
weapons, and they don’t have to, if they don’t want to. How can we make this
happen for the most people possible? What should responsible gun ownership look
like?
I am in the Common Ground, and I am waiting for you to join me for
discussion in the Common Ground.
Brilliantly written and I agree with you. We own a gun in each of our two homes. I don't have a problem with gun ownership. I have a big problem with assault guns. This is the first tragedy which is creating a serious dialogue concerning gun control. So sad Columbine or Virginia Tech wasn't enough to do it. If it had, maybe 26 innocent people would be alive today.
ReplyDeleteLike! :) Oh, wait, this isn't Facebook. See what that thing has done to me? Great post. Well thought out. If I take the conversations I've had in person with folks on both sides of the aisle of this issue, I think most folks are close to your common ground. The fringe-dwellers are the loudest though, so that's who we all hear from online and in the news. Here's to hoping for a thoughtful compromise.
ReplyDeleteCheers,
Casey